REST APIs
Authentication, account and entitlement imports, provisioning and deprovisioning, pagination and API dependencies shaped the integration pathway.
CASE STUDY / IDENTITY GOVERNANCE & ADMINISTRATION
Scaling IGA adoption.
5×+ application coverage.
An enterprise onboarding model for Saviynt—connecting business impact, access risk and application readiness to repeatable integration pathways. Built to expand adoption and leave a blueprint for continued delivery.
THE CHALLENGE
Scale the programme.
Establish the governance baseline.
At the start of the engagement, 10 applications were onboarded to Saviynt. Scaling adoption required a structured way to assess application criticality, define governance requirements and sequence integrations across a varied enterprise estate.
The work brought application teams and identity delivery together around a shared capability blueprint: clear stages, standard pathways and explicit decisions for non-standard requirements. Saviynt operated within a wider landscape of Delinea privileged access and Microsoft Entra identity services.
WHAT CHANGED
5×+ application coverage.
A model for the next wave.
The onboarded application portfolio grew from 10 to more than 50 during the engagement. The lasting asset was the onboarding operating model: documented integration pathways, governance requirements and repeatable decision points the team could carry forward.
10Before NoorGuard
50+After NoorGuard
Before NoorGuardAdditional coverage
Total applications onboarded to Saviynt: 10 at the start and more than 50 by the end of the engagement.
THE DELIVERY
A staged route to governed access.
The IGA delivery role combined a capability blueprint, risk-led application prioritisation and a staged onboarding method. The framework distinguished the governance baseline from later enhancements, giving application and platform teams a common delivery language, with PoC leadership to validate integration feasibility and inform pathway decisions before wider adoption.
- 01 —
Initiation
Established onboarding priorities through business-impact assessment, application readiness and stakeholder engagement. Defined the information and ownership needed to mobilise application teams.
- 02 —
Discovery
Structured discovery around connectivity, account and entitlement reconciliation, ownership and data quality. Used findings to identify integration complexity and readiness gaps before baselining.
- 03 —
Baseline
Defined a common governance baseline for access requests, approval workflows, certification and lifecycle revocation, with requirements shaped by data classification, sensitivity and access risk.
- 04 —
Enhancements
Set out an iterative route for role mining, birthright access, tailored reporting and additional automation, extending the baseline as application needs and readiness allowed.
CONNECTOR-SPECIFIC INTEGRATION PATHWAYS
Standardise the decisions. Adapt the integration.
A common governance model, with distinct pathways for API, database and directory-backed applications. Standard requirements, controlled deviations and readiness gaps made the next integration decision explicit.
Database applications
JDBC connectivity, account and entitlement models, lifecycle operations and data integrity informed the database onboarding approach.
Active Directory
Group-based access, naming, nesting and entitlement ownership informed how directory-backed applications would be integrated and governed.
Microsoft Entra ID
Group and application-role authorisation, entitlement ownership and access-request requirements were mapped into the onboarding decision.
RISK-ALIGNED GOVERNANCE
Classification and ownership shape the control.
The blueprint accounted for account and entitlement ownership, orphaned accounts, inactive access, segregation of duties and out-of-band changes. Data classification and sensitivity informed approval, certification and revocation requirements.
Clear readiness criteria and documented exceptions gave application teams a practical route to the agreed baseline, with further capabilities introduced through enhancements.
THE IDENTITY LANDSCAPE
One adoption challenge.
A wider identity estate.
The delivery focus was Saviynt adoption, with privileged access and the identity provider forming part of the surrounding platform context.
Saviynt- Identity governance & administration
Delinea- Privileged access management
Microsoft Entra- Identity provider
IN THEIR WORDS
“NoorGuard came in as a technology partner for IGA to assist with our accelerated adoption. Through their expertise and pragmatic approach, they have been instrumental in delivery.”
THE LASTING VALUE
A blueprint for scale.
A common basis for decisions.
Reusable pathways give future application onboarding a common starting point. They make integration complexity, ownership and governance requirements visible before delivery commitments are made, supporting a more consistent approach to adoption.
For the next discovery, understand the application's identity, privileged-access and certificate/PKI dependencies as well as its lifecycle requirements. A repeatable pattern should still reflect the context.
Explore identity governance See how we work